“USA USA USA!” It is with this patriotic clamor that the inhabitants of Watertown, near Boston, welcomed the police Friday, returned victorious from their hunt for the second suspect in the bombing that killed three people in the Boston Marathon. Cheering, the people, “most of whom were wearing sportswear Boston” cheered, honked, shouted “Boston proud! Strong Boston”, or the eternal “God bless America,” says Slate.
Not to mention the cries “BPD” in honor of the Boston Police Department, reports the Boston Globe, which publishes video and testimony: “It is as if we were under siege, and it was now up “, thus an enthusiastic young man. The people, who were forbidden to leave their homes during the “manhunt” twenty-four hours have indeed seen metamorphose from their window, their neighborhood “war zone,” reports Boston Magazine.
These past emotions, time is the good report in the American press, as illustrated by the Washington Post editorial: “The events of Friday showed that the U.S. and its internal security forces are better prepared to respond to terrorism a decade ago. ”
ORIGINS OF THE ISLAMIC Chechens TRACK
Time is also looking for explanations. And, given the absence of known claims and the two suspects motivations, Tsarnaev brothers, the press looks on their profile and, most importantly, their Chechen roots – focusing on their integration into American society and their connections with Islam (eg portraits of the Financial Times, “The flight of two brothers, war violence” New Yorker, “The guilty” or the Boston Globe, “The brothers of the attack on marathon followed two paths to infamy “)
If you do not know, therefore, whether the suspects were able to act alone or with an organization, and why, “Chechen their family roots, however, may be relevant”, believes the Financial Times. For suggest some media, Chechnya Islam, there is only one step. “Since the mid-1990s, there are close links between militant groups based in the North Caucasus, and the Afghan Taliban and al-Qaeda” and the article says the FT. Islamist agenda, “far beyond Chechnya” has, over the conflict, married a war whose primary motivations were nationalists. In the New York Times article “When Beslan meeting Columbine” also recalls a Chechen leader launched in 2007: “Our enemy is not only Russia, but all those who are waging a war against Islam . ”
But “there is evidence that Tsarnaev (…) admired the Islamic extremists,” says the Washington Post, which cites videos glory of jihad posted on the YouTube account was? Born of two brothers. In the Washington Times, the track of a “self-radicalization” via the Internet, used “as an open school of terrorism” is even mentioned. In the Huffington Post, a forum for Howard Fineman goes even further: if you do not know what the motivations of the two suspects, “we know where they come from: a violent Caucasus countries, ignited and blood questions of religious and ethnic pride. ” The brothers “were re? U political asylum because of a war in Chechnya that have now imported in Boston, whether they wanted to or not,” joked the editor.
Do not give in to speculation
Faced with these speculations, the Financial Times editorial warned: while almost everything, still “fuzzy” about the attack, while multiply “rumors” and “denied”, “it is vital to stick that we know. ” “Were they isolated or were they part of a group? From within or imported? Was it a single shot, or a larger plan? Until one has responded to some of these issues , generalizations should be treated with suspicion. ”
The financial daily also rejects any parallel with the growing debate in the United States, around a major reform of illegal immigration: Tsarnaev brothers were legal immigrants school. However, the point is not trivial, at a time when some American figures have not resisted capture the event to politicize it, as an article in Boston Magazine shows. And, if the link to the debate on immigration is not the taste of all, some suggest an alternative, which runs through much of American society, a few days after the failure of the reform desired by Barack Obama : access to weapons.
The attack raises questions, believes the Financial Times about “the fact that these two brothers were able to have easy access to material that can kill on a large scale.” Because, beyond their Chechen roots, “there was already enough evidence, the United States, to alienate young men like Adam Lanza, Dylan Klebold and other perpetrators of killings in recent history. There is enough weapons to kill anyone you want, and a fool can always find any excuse for his crime if he seeks, “notes the New York Times. In any case, “it is certainly a tragic story about America, much more than exotic tale from elsewhere. Whatever happened, it happened here,” said an article The New Yorker.
See more about: lawn mower reviews 2013